Featuring commentary from Sadie Stein and Garth Greenwell

In chapter 59 of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice (1813), Mr. Bennet calls Elizabeth Bennet into his library, hears her out about Darcy, and tells her: "I could not have parted with you, my Lizzy, to anyone less worthy." Sadie Stein, in her Rebind commentary on Pride and Prejudice, ranks this scene above either of Darcy's proposals:

"But the part that really makes me cry is when Elizabeth goes in to talk to her father, which, for my money, is the most moving scene in the entire novel."

In Book Two of Henry James's The Golden Bowl (1904), Adam Verver proposes to Charlotte Stant at Brighton and is accepted, and his eyes fill. He isn't thinking about Charlotte but about his daughter Maggie Verver and what he believes she has arranged for him, "what my child does for me." Garth Greenwell, in his Rebind commentary on The Golden Bowl, reads the moment without sentiment: "This man being accepted by one woman cries for another. Being accepted by the woman who will become his wife, he cries instead, thinking about his daughter. A red flag."

These are two novels in which a father's love is the formative fact of the heroine's life, and both commentators say so. Where they differ is on what that love does to the daughter, and on who finally has to end it. In Austen the father gives his daughter up himself, in half a sentence, as a gift. In James the father can't, so the daughter has to do it for both of them, and the whole plot is the cost of the delay.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe to continue reading

Read Deeper

Paid In


Paul Guyer's Kant lets you hire a man if you pay him fairly. Garth Greenwell's Adam Verver pays the Prince perfectly and still does him a profound wrong.

Go deeper →

Nature Gives the Rule


John Kaag's Thoreau lifts Kant's definition of genius and gives it to a Concord woodchopper. Paul Guyer's Kant has one condition Thoreau refuses: be understood.

Go deeper →

Prison and Cemetery


Margaret Atwood watches a revolution devour its makers in real time. Megan Marshall watches one win, settle, and build a prison and a graveyard first.

Go deeper →

The Scarlet D


Boston sewed Hester's A in cloth; New York pinned Ellen's D in whispers. Marshall and Gay show which mark a woman can work, and it isn't the polite one.

Go deeper →

Who Is Maggie Verver, and Why Does Everyone Underestimate Her?


Garth Greenwell reads Maggie Verver as James's great deception: taken for an innocent, she outthinks everyone and wins by choosing the scapegoat's part.

Go deeper →

The Price of Knowing: James, Wharton, and the Women Who See Everything


Maggie Verver and May Welland are the real intelligences of their novels. Greenwell and Gay part on what each does with knowledge: reconstruction or control.

Go deeper →

Why Darcy Falls for Elizabeth in Spite of Himself


Darcy falls for Elizabeth because she alone does not perform for him, Stein argues — her wit is character, not strategy, and he falls in spite of himself.

Go deeper →

Was Charlotte Lucas Right to Marry Mr. Collins?


Stein reads Charlotte Lucas's marriage as clear-eyed and defensible: in Austen's marriage market, Elizabeth's freedom to refuse was the exception, not the rule.

Go deeper →

Marriage, Money, and the Village Religion of Pride and Prejudice


Stein argues the romance sits on hard economics: a village credo of marriage, too few men, and a good match as the difference between security and ruin.

Go deeper →

The Optimist's Trap: Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius Against Positive Thinking


Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius attack the same enemy: the optimism that turns your suffering into proof of your own inadequacy.

Go deeper →

This Is My Way


Zarathustra's missing way and Thoreau's different drummer are the same demand, Martin and Kaag show: there is no ready-made path — only the one you make.

Go deeper →

Saying Yes to the Nick of Time


Thoreau's deliberate living and Nietzsche's amor fati are two disciplines with one target, Kaag and Martin show: the habit of living everywhere but now.

Go deeper →

Read with the Best

A literary publication for the self-taught reader. Where to start, which translation, why it matters — with editors who'll actually take a side.