Featuring commentary from Paul Guyer and Clancy Martin

Two philosophers, a century apart, place the same astonishing power at the center of human life: the power to be a law unto oneself. Immanuel Kant calls it autonomy, the will legislating the moral law for itself. Friedrich Nietzsche calls it self-overcoming, the creation of new values after the death of God. Paul Guyer reads the first in his Rebind commentary on Kant, Clancy Martin the second in his commentary on Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and set side by side their readings reveal two thinkers who agree on the most radical point, that the human being is a lawgiver, and disagree, completely, about what kind of law gets given.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe to continue reading

Read Deeper

Paid In


Paul Guyer's Kant lets you hire a man if you pay him fairly. Garth Greenwell's Adam Verver pays the Prince perfectly and still does him a profound wrong.

Go deeper →

Nature Gives the Rule


John Kaag's Thoreau lifts Kant's definition of genius and gives it to a Concord woodchopper. Paul Guyer's Kant has one condition Thoreau refuses: be understood.

Go deeper →

Prison and Cemetery


Margaret Atwood watches a revolution devour its makers in real time. Megan Marshall watches one win, settle, and build a prison and a graveyard first.

Go deeper →

The Scarlet D


Boston sewed Hester's A in cloth; New York pinned Ellen's D in whispers. Marshall and Gay show which mark a woman can work, and it isn't the polite one.

Go deeper →

I Couldn't Have Given You Up to Anyone Less


Sadie Stein weeps at Mr. Bennet's half-sentence goodbye. Garth Greenwell reads a whole novel about a father who can't say it, so the daughter must.

Go deeper →

The Price of Knowing: James, Wharton, and the Women Who See Everything


Maggie Verver and May Welland are the real intelligences of their novels. Greenwell and Gay part on what each does with knowledge: reconstruction or control.

Go deeper →

What Was Kant's Copernican Revolution?


Kant's Copernican revolution: objects conform to the mind, which supplies space and time — securing science on a foundation Guyer himself doubts.

Go deeper →

What Is the Übermensch?


The Übermensch is not a superman or a master race but Nietzsche's name for the human being who stops receiving values and starts creating them.

Go deeper →

What Is Eternal Recurrence?


Could you say yes to living this exact life again — every joy, every humiliation, every loss — forever?

Go deeper →

The Optimist's Trap: Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius Against Positive Thinking


Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius attack the same enemy: the optimism that turns your suffering into proof of your own inadequacy.

Go deeper →

What Did Nietzsche Mean by the Death of God?


The death of God is Nietzsche's diagnosis, not his boast: inherited values have collapsed, and either nihilism or human value-creation fills the vacuum.

Go deeper →

Saying Yes to the Nick of Time


Thoreau's deliberate living and Nietzsche's amor fati are two disciplines with one target, Kaag and Martin show: the habit of living everywhere but now.

Go deeper →

Read with the Best

A literary publication for the self-taught reader. Where to start, which translation, why it matters — with editors who'll actually take a side.