Featuring commentary from Megan Marshall and John Kaag

Hester Prynne never leaves Boston. Henry David Thoreau never really leaves Concord. Both of them, in their own books, become a law unto themselves without going anywhere at all, and the difference in how they manage it says something about what nonconformity actually costs.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe to continue reading

Read Deeper

Nature Gives the Rule


John Kaag's Thoreau lifts Kant's definition of genius and gives it to a Concord woodchopper. Paul Guyer's Kant has one condition Thoreau refuses: be understood.

Go deeper →

Paid In


Paul Guyer's Kant lets you hire a man if you pay him fairly. Garth Greenwell's Adam Verver pays the Prince perfectly and still does him a profound wrong.

Go deeper →

Prison and Cemetery


Margaret Atwood watches a revolution devour its makers in real time. Megan Marshall watches one win, settle, and build a prison and a graveyard first.

Go deeper →

I Couldn't Have Given You Up to Anyone Less


Sadie Stein weeps at Mr. Bennet's half-sentence goodbye. Garth Greenwell reads a whole novel about a father who can't say it, so the daughter must.

Go deeper →

The Scarlet D


Boston sewed Hester's A in cloth; New York pinned Ellen's D in whispers. Marshall and Gay show which mark a woman can work, and it isn't the polite one.

Go deeper →

The Price of Knowing: James, Wharton, and the Women Who See Everything


Maggie Verver and May Welland are the real intelligences of their novels. Greenwell and Gay part on what each does with knowledge: reconstruction or control.

Go deeper →

What Did Thoreau Mean by Living Deliberately?


To live deliberately is to pay attention, Kaag argues — mindfulness of passing experience and honest self-reflection. No wilderness required.

Go deeper →

Why Did Thoreau Go to Walden Pond?


Thoreau went to Walden in 1845 to test which necessities are real and to find out, before dying, whether he had lived — a question Kaag says still travels.

Go deeper →

The Optimist's Trap: Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius Against Positive Thinking


Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius attack the same enemy: the optimism that turns your suffering into proof of your own inadequacy.

Go deeper →

What Does the A on Hester's Chest Actually Mean?


The A never holds still: adulteress at the scaffold, able and armor at the cottage, awe by the end — Marshall tracks a symbol its makers couldn't control.

Go deeper →

The Knitting and the Eagle: Nietzsche, Dickens, and the Morality of Vengeance


Madame Defarge's knitting is ressentiment made visible, Atwood and Martin show — legitimate rage metastasized into a register that cannot stop expanding.

Go deeper →

This Is My Way


Zarathustra's missing way and Thoreau's different drummer are the same demand, Martin and Kaag show: there is no ready-made path — only the one you make.

Go deeper →

Read with the Best

A literary publication for the self-taught reader. Where to start, which translation, why it matters — with editors who'll actually take a side.