In Conversation

The Knitting and the Eagle: Nietzsche, Dickens, and the Morality of Vengeance

Featuring commentary from Clancy Martin and Margaret Atwood

Midway through A Tale of Two Cities, Madame Defarge’s husband confesses to discouragement. The revolution is taking too long. They may not live to see it. And she answers him with one of the most arresting speeches in the novel: “But how long does it take to prepare the lightning? How long does it take to prepare the earthquake? You don’t even know that, because you don’t see it. And people aren’t seeing us either, but we’re doing it, and it’s coming, and it’s on the road. It’s inevitable. It will come.”

Margaret Atwood, reading the passage in her Rebind commentary on A Tale of Two Cities, pauses on those sentences. She is not applauding them; she is watching something build that she already knows will destroy its builder.

Friedrich Nietzsche had a name for what Madame Defarge is doing in that speech, and in every scene before it. He called it ressentiment, a French word he kept in French because no German or English equivalent quite captured it. Resentment is too weak. Ressentiment is a philosophy. It is what happens when the capacity for direct action is blocked, and the blocked energy turns inward, accumulates, and eventually produces a complete inversion of values: the values of those who oppressed you become evil, and the values forged in opposition to them become good. The knitting is not just a record but a moral system, built stitch by stitch across years of enforced patience.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe to continue reading

Read Deeper

Nature Gives the Rule


John Kaag's Thoreau lifts Kant's definition of genius and gives it to a Concord woodchopper. Paul Guyer's Kant has one condition Thoreau refuses: be understood.

Go deeper →

Paid In


Paul Guyer's Kant lets you hire a man if you pay him fairly. Garth Greenwell's Adam Verver pays the Prince perfectly and still does him a profound wrong.

Go deeper →

Prison and Cemetery


Margaret Atwood watches a revolution devour its makers in real time. Megan Marshall watches one win, settle, and build a prison and a graveyard first.

Go deeper →

The Scarlet D


Boston sewed Hester's A in cloth; New York pinned Ellen's D in whispers. Marshall and Gay show which mark a woman can work, and it isn't the polite one.

Go deeper →

I Couldn't Have Given You Up to Anyone Less


Sadie Stein weeps at Mr. Bennet's half-sentence goodbye. Garth Greenwell reads a whole novel about a father who can't say it, so the daughter must.

Go deeper →

Sydney Carton, Darnay's Shadow: Atwood on the Real Hero of A Tale of Two Cities


Atwood reads Sydney Carton as Darnay's shadow self and an addict, not a sentimental martyr — the real hero Dickens was writing toward.

Go deeper →

The Price of Knowing: James, Wharton, and the Women Who See Everything


Maggie Verver and May Welland are the real intelligences of their novels. Greenwell and Gay part on what each does with knowledge: reconstruction or control.

Go deeper →

What Is the Übermensch?


The Übermensch is not a superman or a master race but Nietzsche's name for the human being who stops receiving values and starts creating them.

Go deeper →

What Is Eternal Recurrence?


Could you say yes to living this exact life again — every joy, every humiliation, every loss — forever?

Go deeper →

The Optimist's Trap: Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius Against Positive Thinking


Voltaire and Marcus Aurelius attack the same enemy: the optimism that turns your suffering into proof of your own inadequacy.

Go deeper →

What Did Nietzsche Mean by the Death of God?


The death of God is Nietzsche's diagnosis, not his boast: inherited values have collapsed, and either nihilism or human value-creation fills the vacuum.

Go deeper →

This Is My Way


Zarathustra's missing way and Thoreau's different drummer are the same demand, Martin and Kaag show: there is no ready-made path — only the one you make.

Go deeper →

Read with the Best

A literary publication for the self-taught reader. Where to start, which translation, why it matters — with editors who'll actually take a side.